Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

WM - Wealth Manager
Register free for our breaking news email alerts with analysis and cutting edge commentary from our award winning team. Registration only takes a minute.

Revealed: Gars pain grows with £17.2 billion blow

We've crunched the data ahead of Aberdeen Standard's results tomorrow and it is not looking good for the multi-asset strategy.

Revealed: Gars pain grows with £17.2 billion blow

Aberdeen Standard's Gars and its offspring at Invesco and Aviva have lost billions in assets since the start of 2018. 

We have crunched the numbers to reveal that Gars bore the brunt of this sell-off, with investors pulling an eye-watering £17.2 billion from the strategy since the beginning of last year across UK, European and US versions of the fund.

Our findings, which come ahead of of Aberdeen Standard's full-year results tomorrow, are based on Lipper data. They show that the fund has more than halved in value in 14 months, from £32.8 billion at the beginning of 2018 to just £14.4 billion at the end of February this year.

The UK version of the fund alone has suffered a £9.8 billion estimated net outflow over the same period, with assets falling from £20.7 billion to £10 billion; this compares with outflows of £4.9 billion from the European Sicav and further £2.4 billion from their distribution tie up with John Hancock in the US.

While the numbers are large, it is unlikely to be the extent of the outflows with SLI having formed similar distribution deals with banks in Japan during the product's heyday, in addition to segregated institutional mandates.

The withdrawals were at their peak in November and December, with estimated net outflows of £2.7 billion and £2.4 billion, respectively.

In total, the fund had net outflows of £6.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2018. The scale of the redemptions has tempered this year, yet £1.1 billion was still pulled in both January and February.

The outflows come at a time when the performance of all but the most aggressive mixed assets funds have suffered as global equity markets have continued their decade-long rally.

Gars offspring also struggle

Gars has taken the brunt of the outflows, but the reality is that its two closest competitors have been lacklustre when it comes to performance.

Invesco Global Targeted Returns (GTR) and Aviva Investors Multi-Strategy Target Return (Aims) – which were both established by former members of the Gars team –  have also suffered outflows over the same timeframe.

However, the figures are much more modest, at £2.3 billion and £1.5 billion, respectively, over the 14-month period. This has led to Gars being usurped by GTR as the largest of the trio of sophisticated multi-asset funds.

Over the past three years, all funds have been in the red, with losses of 2.7% for Gars, compared with 1.2% for GTR and 4.6% for Aims.

All three have lagged behind the Alternative Ucits Multi-Strategy peer group average, which gained 2.3% over the same timeframe. This compares with a 30.4% gain by the FTSE All-Share and an 8% rise in the value of gilts.

Aims in particular had a woeful end to the year, falling 5.2% in December’s turbulent market, greater even than the 3.8% decline the value of the FTSE All Share. By contrast, Gars fell 0.3%, while GTR turned in a respectable 0.5% gain.

In total, the global Alternative Ucits – Multi-Strategy peer group has had net outflows of £22.5 billion over the period, with the trio contributing £21 billion to that figure.

JP Morgan leads the funds taking in the most net new money in the peer group, with James Elliot and Shrenick Shah’s Global Macro Opportunities fund up £1.7 billion net over the period across both UK and European versions. Amundi is in second place, with its Absolute Return Multi-Strategy fund having net inflows of £0.8 billion.

Across the multi-asset spectrum, though, Allianz Income and Growth has been the bestselling fund in Europe over this period – in any asset class – taking in £7.1 billion of net new money.

The H2O Adagio fund is in second place, with £4.4 billion, though the global macro fund soft-closed to new investment in May 2018.

Share this story

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.

Share this story


Related Fund Managers

Shrenick Shah
Shrenick Shah Average Total Return:
6/39 in Alternative UCITS - Multi Strategy (Performance over 3 years)
Gwilym Satchell
Gwilym Satchell Average Total Return:
38/67 in Alternative UCITS - Multi Strategy (Performance over 1 year)
Richard Batty
Richard Batty Average Total Return:
30/39 in Alternative UCITS - Multi Strategy (Performance over 3 years)
David Jubb
David Jubb Average Total Return:
29/39 in Alternative UCITS - Multi Strategy (Performance over 3 years)
David Millar
David Millar Average Total Return:
28/39 in Alternative UCITS - Multi Strategy (Performance over 3 years)
Vincent Chailley
Vincent Chailley Average Total Return:
3/15 in Alternative UCITS - Global Macro (Performance over 3 years)
Francesco Dall'Angelo
Francesco Dall'Angelo
Davide Cataldo
Davide Cataldo
James Elliot
James Elliot

Top stories

Read More