Wealth Manager - the site for professional investment managers

Register to get unlimited access to Citywire’s fund manager database. Registration is free and only takes a minute.

Crazy in ETF love? New study imagines bottling star quality

Crazy in ETF love? New study imagines bottling star quality

Identifying star power before it becomes self-evident is no easier in the investment business than in show business. Those tasked with finding tomorrow’s stars therefore have to rely on proxies, whether a dazzling smile or a killer app.

In both worlds, it’s important to distinguish genuine stars from those who merely possess some quality, which is far more readily apparent and so less valuable. The equivalent of a classically trained actor, for instance, could be a stock that qualifies for a quality index thanks to ‘strong and stable’ earnings.


But that, like theatre experience, implies reliability rather than true stardom. The MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality index contains Microsoft but not Facebook, for example, and Apple but not Amazon.

A new paper – by David Dorn of the University of Zurich, Lawrence Katz of Harvard University, and David Autor, Christina Patterson, and John Van Reenen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – offers an alternative way to define what they term ‘superstar’ companies. Their research is primarily concerned with labour’s falling share of GDP, which they argue can in part be attributed to these businesses.

‘We present a new “superstar firm” model of the labour share change,’ the academics explain. ‘The model is based on the idea that industries are increasingly characterised by a “winner takes most” feature where a small number of firms gain a very large share of the market.’

Although it is not the focus of the study, the prospect of owning these superstars will be of interest to investors. As examples of such firms, the authors cite obvious names including Google, Facebook, Apple, and Amazon, but also stocks that may not be expected like Wal-Mart and FedEx as well as unicorns such as Uber and Airbnb.

Shedding staff

What unites these firms? Autor et al point to a dominant market share by sales in the company’s industry, a low employee-to-revenue ratio, and a high patent intensity and total factor productivity. These metrics could form the basis of an index methodology and thus an ETF.

Some of the themes propelling these superstars to pre-eminence in their markets – the application of automation and artificial intelligence, for example – have already proven popular with investors, judging by flows into niche active and passive funds targeting these areas.

Looking at the superstars’ high present valuations, some may prefer to own their suppliers through artificial intelligence and automation portfolios. After all, those trends appear secular whereas superstars come and go.

Autor and co’s superstars may be different from the black holes of the past, though, benefiting from more defensive characteristics.

Digging moats

‘Firms initially gain high market shares by legitimately competing on the merits of their innovations or superior efficiency,’ the authors contend. ‘Once they have gained a commanding position, however, they use their market power to erect various barriers to entry to protect their position. Nothing in our analysis rules out this mechanism.’

The academics' findings come as just this week,  Renaud de Planta, chairman at Swiss active asset manager Pictet (which has recently soft closed a robotics fund) likened passive investments to antibiotics: 'Valuable when deployed in moderation, but likely to do more harm than good should their use become widespread.'

He reasoned the practice erodes competitive forces, because companies in the same sector end up with the same investor base.

However for investors following Autor and co’s labour share change model, the near-monopolistic nature of superstar firms could actually make them more defensive than traditional quality stocks.

That may provide some comfort to those hesitating while the superstars are flying at all-time highs.

Leave a comment!

Please sign in or register to comment. It is free to register and only takes a minute or two.
Citywire TV
CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

CIO Tapes 2: two warnings and a lot of optimism

Our group of leading asset management CIOs see a lot of opportunities – and overseas investors are buying UK too

Play Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

Wealth Manager Retreat 2017: size isn't everything

We asked our delegates at the Wealth Manager Retreat what they think about the recent wave of consolidation in the industry.

1 Comment Play CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

CIO Tapes - part 3: 'passive funds are anti-capitalist'

Citywire recently gathered three of the UK's leading fund investment heads to discuss their hopes, fears and the issues that their jobs throw at them daily.

Read More
Your Business: Cover Star Club

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Profile: Thomas Miller explains its post-restructure plans

Thomas Miller Investment’s (TMI) head of wealth Matt Phillips has strong opinions about many things

Wealth Manager on Twitter